Knowledge Bowl was k. My team isn’t going to state, but another team is and the other team is tied with another local school. It’s interesting. I might even come along with them, since they need alternates!
On the way back, however, we had a huge conversation about religion. I did not establish this, mind you. I tried very hard to not be insulting towards everyone else.
… But man, I thought the people on Knowledge Bowl would be smarter than this. Yeah, it was a pretty ignorant assumption to make, whatever. I expected them to be slightly skeptical of things like this. I’m pretty ticked off. I do appreciate how the guy who thinks I’m hot looked at me with such hope and adoration when I said that I wanted to announce something to the group, only for his dreams to be smashed down by my antitheistic/atheistic views. Uh, that’s what you get for being Catholic? :3
The thing that bugged me the most was how I was so torn between my “it comforts them, let them believe whatever they want.” and my “oh my god, they are so wrong about everything.” I was ready to bring it. Aw, I had so much faith in all these people not to let me down with their religious stuff. Oh, and their arguments were so weak. And typical. The conversation was not thought-provoking at all, which disappointed me because I had hoped that it would be; that is the reason why I was listening in the first place. I had heard it all before. Only by people that I had respected less. Well.
With Christianity, I’m not completely all right with it but I do not necessarily disagree with it. I think I can attribute that to the fact that I have met more passive Christians than I have met, say, fundamental Mormons. And there are alot of fundamental Mormons that I know. I oppose LDS at about the same level of Co$. The degradation of women seems to be more prevalent within the Mormon community than the Christian community. At least there are some Christians that are somewhat skeptical about their religion and tailor it to their needs, but it seems like there are more Mormons who are willing to accept it. Hah, I don’t think passive Co$ believers exist. I mean, if you have to pay thousands of dollars to achieve a higher status in a church, it wouldn’t be particularly easy to admit that the system is wrong.
Oh, not to mention that LDS and Co$ are cults.
Me: What is the point of salvation if you don’t even know what God forgives and punishes you for?
*everyone else carries on*
Me: Oh, and by the way, Jesus never existed.
*Kenny glares at me from the depths of his soul*
Me: Yeah, you heard that, didn’t you?!
*Kenny resumes reading his Salvation Map aloud*
_edit
So, what has this conversation done to my perspective of my peers?
I would hope the impact would be very little. I want to judge people by what they do and not what they think. Somehow, I don’t think I’m at that point yet. This doesn’t mean that I’m going to think they are dumber than I am, that they are bad people, or that they are any less respectable. I’m not sure what this means.
It annoys me that people can lie to themselves this substantially just to maintain homeostasis. That they do not try to get all of the facts before making a proper assumption. That they aren’t strong enough to face the facts. I also understand, though, that getting all the facts and all that jazz may not work for everyone. There are certain things people have to do to make themselves feel comfortable- even if I acknowledge it as it happens, I still do this for myself all the time.
As illogical as it is, I don’t want to admit that I do not have all the answers. I don’t think that’s illogical at all, actually, I’m sugarcoating it. People are smarter than I am, but I have a full grasp of this religious thing. I know more than most “religious” people do.
Oh- but to completely ignore contradictory facts to make oneself feel comfortable, is a completely different thing. It is forgivable to do this for minor things- not while choosing the foundations of your life. laskjdfl;askjdflkjdsf
—> Now, let’s reflect this back to myself. I know there is nothing I can say to these people to make them begin to question their beliefs. Quite honestly, I think they attach too much sentiment to them, because really, they have inherited these beliefs from their parents; it is that simple. Am I really this stubborn that I consistently get into arguments with people about this, even if I know that I am not going to progress at all? Perhaps I have not been exposed to this stuff live much. I can recall about fifteen instances in real life within the past couple of years that bring religion into question.
Another thing is that during this discussion, I spoke very little. I do not know when I’m being too harsh or if something I am saying is even insulting. I say what I mean, but that’s a pretty bold statement because I try pretty hard to sugarcoat whatever I am saying. But I never really know if I am being insulting. I suppose that is the Enlightenment fallacy at work. I tend to think that if I just put the truth out there, people will see that, and not whatever else they perceive it to be. Which is, of course, wrong.